Vol. 3 · pages 161–165
Philosophy of Hinduism; Revolution and Counter-Revolution in Ancient India; Buddha or Karl Marx
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 161 (printed page 148)
148 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
position in Hindu Society, how are they related to the Savarna Hindus
are questions to which no attention has so far been paid. I am sure that
without considering these questions no one can get a true picture of the
social structure the Hindus have built. To leave out the Class clevage
between the Savarna Hindus and the Avarna Hindus is to relate Grimm’s
Fairy Tale which leaves out the witches, the goblins and the orges.
The Avarna Hindus comprise three
(INCOMPLETE)
zz
PDF page 162
Part III
Revolution and
Counter-Revolution
in Ancient India
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar had proposed to write a treatise,
i.e., ‘Revolution and Counter’ Revolution in Ancient
India’.The table of contents has been printed in the
chapter of schemes. He had originally planned to
write seven books to be included under this broad
title. The Committee was able to find some pages and
few chapters in his collection. The chapters are also
incomplete. After scrutiny, the Committee came to a
decision that ‘Revolution and Counter-Revolution in
Ancient India’ is to be presented in this volume with the
available material though incomplete. Dr. Ambedkar
considered the rise of Buddhism as revolution. The
Counter-Revolution pioneered by Brahmins 1 resulted
into decline and fall of Buddhism.
Contd. overleaf
PDF page 163
As such the following chapters are included under
this title.
1. Ancient India on Exhumation
2 The Ancient Regime—The State of the
Aryan Society
3. A Sunken Priesthood
4. Reformers and Their Fate
5. The Decline and Fall of Buddhism
6. The Literature of Brahminism
7. Triumph of Brahminism
8. The Morals of the House—Manusmruti
or the Gospel of Counter-Revolution
9. Philosophic Defence of CounterRevolution (Krishna and his Gita)
10. Analysis of Virat Parva and Uddyog Parva
11. Brahmins V/s Kshatriyas
12. The Shudras and the Counter-Revolution
13. The Women and the Counter-Revolution
The readers may compare these chapters with
the proposed plan given in the last chapters of
Schemes.—Editors
PDF page 164 (printed page 5)
CHAPTER 5
Ancient India On Exhumation
There are two typed copies of this Chapter. Both of them contain
additions and corrections in the handwriting of Dr. Babasaheb
Ambedkar. After consideration, we decided that the latter
version should be included here. This essay, consisting of three
pages only, seems to be an introduction to a larger subject Dr.
Ambedkar probably had in his mind. —Editors,
Much of the ancient history of India is no history at all. Not that
ancient India has no history. It has plenty of it. But it has lost its
character. It has been made mythology to amuse women and children.
This seems to have been done deliberately by the Brahminical writers.
Take the word Deva. What does it mean? Is the word Jana Vishesh
represent a member of the human family? It is made to appear
superhuman agency. By this the pith of history contained in it is
squeezed out.
Along with the word Deva occur the names of Yaksha, Gana,
Gandharva, Kinnars. Who were they? The imperession one gets on
reading the Mahabharat and Ramayan is that they are imaginary
beings who filled the horizon but did not exist.
But the Yaksha, Gana, Gandharva, Kinnaras were also members
of the human family. They were in the service of the Devas. The
Yakshas were guarding the palaces. Ganas were guarding the Devas.
Gandharvas were amusing the Devas by music and dancing. The
Kinnaras were also in the service of the Gods. The descendants of
the Kinnaras are even now living in Himachal Pradesh.
Take the name Asura. The description of Asura given, in the
Mahabharat and Ramayana make out as though they belonged to nonhuman world. An Asura is described to eat ten carts-load of food. They
are monsters in size. They sleep for six months. They have ten mouths.
Who is a Rakshas? He too is described as a non-human creature. In size,
in his capacity for eating, in his habits of life he resembled the Asura.
PDF page 165 (printed page 152)
152 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
There is a plenty of references to the Nagas. But who is a Naga? A
Naga is represented as a serpent or a snake. Can this be true ? Whether
true or not, it is so and Hindus believe it. Ancient Indian history must
be exhumed. Without its exhumation Ancient India will go without
history. Fortunately with the help of the Buddhist literature, Ancient
Indian History can be dug out of the debris which the Brahmin writers
have heaped upon in a fit of madness.
The Buddhist literature helps a great deal to remove the debris and
see the underlying substance quite clearly and distinctly.
The Buddhist literature shows that the Devas were a community of
human beings. There are so many Devas who come to the Buddha to
have their doubts and difficulties removed. How could this be unless the
Devas were human beings.
Again the Buddhist canonical literature throws a flood of light on the
puzzling question of the Nagas. It makes a distinction between wombborn Nagas and egg-born Nagas and thereby making it clear that the
word Naga has two-fold meaning. In its original sense it stood for the
name of a human community.
The Asuras again are not monsters. They too are a Jan-Vishesh
human beings. According to Satpatha Bramhana, the Asuras are the
descendants of Prajapati the Lord of the creation. How they became evil
spirits is not known. But the fact is recorded that they fought against
the Devas for the possession of the earth and that they were overcome
by the Devas and that they finally succumbed. The point is clear that
the Asuras were members of the human family and not monsters.
With this exhumation of debris, we can see Ancient Indian History
in a new light.
zz