Vol. 5 · pages 221–225
Essays on Untouchables and Untouchability
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 221 (printed page 206)
206 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
to go and bewitch him by her blandishments. She expressed
great reluctance to expose herself to the wrath of the formidable
muni, but obeyed the repeated injunction of Indra, who promised
that he and Kandarpa (the god of love) should stand by her, and
assumed her most attractive aspect with the view of overcoming
the sage’s impassability. He, however, suspected this design,
and becoming greatly incensed, he dommed the nymph by a
curse to be turned into stone and to continue in that state for a
thousand years. The curse took effect, and Kandarpa and Indra
slunk away. In this way, though he resisted the allurements
of sensual love, he lost the whole fruit of his austerities by
yielding to anger; and had to begin his work over again. He
resolved to check his irascibility, to remain silent, not even to
breathe for hundreds of years; to dry up his body; and to fast
and stop his breath till he had obtained the coveted character
of a Brahman. He then left the Himalaya and travelled to the
east, where he underwent a dreadful exercise, unequalled in
the whole history of austerities, maintaining silence, according
to a vow, for a thousand years. At the end of this time he
had attained to perfection, and although thwarted by many
obstacles, he remained unmoved by anger. On the expiration
of this course of austerity, he prepared some food to eat; which
Indra, coming in the form of a Brahman, begged that he would
give him. Visvamitra did so, and though he had none left for
himself, and was obliged to remain fasting, he said nothing to
the Brahman, on account of his vow of silence. As he continued
to suspend his breath, smoke issued from his head, to the great
consternation and distress of the three worlds. The gods, rishis,
etc., then addressed Brahma: “The great muni Visvamitra has
been allured and provoked in various ways, but still advances
in his sanctity. If his wish is not conceded, he will destroy
the three worlds by the force of his austerity. All the regions
of the universe are confounded, no light anywhere shines; all
the oceans are tossed, and the mountains crumble, the earth
quakes, and the wind blows confusedly. We cannot, O Brahma,
guarantee that mankind shall not become atheistic………
Before the great and glorious sage of fiery form resolves to
destroy (everything) let him be propitiated.” The gods, headed
by Brahma, then addressed Visvamitra: “ Hail Brahman rishi,
we are gratified by thy austerities; O Kausika, thou hast,
through their intesity, attained to Brahmanhood. I, O Brahman,
associated with the Maruts, confer on thee long life. May
every blessing attend thee; depart wherever thou wilt.’ The
sage, delighted, made his obeisance to the gods, and said : ‘If I
have obtained Brahmanhood, and long life, then let the mystic
PDF page 222
207
TOUCHABLES V/S UNTOUCHABLES
monosyllable (omkara) and the sacrificial formula (vashatkara)
and the Vedas recognise me in that capacity. And let Vasishtha,
the son of Brahma, the most eminent of those who are skilled
in the Kshattra-veda, and the Brahma-veda (the knowledge of
the Kshatriya and the Brahmanical disciplines), address me
similarly.’…… Accordingly Vasishtha, being propitiated by the
gods, became reconciled to Visvamitra, and recognised his claim
to all the prerogatives of a Brahman rishi.…… Visvamitra,
too, having attained the Brahmanical rank, paid all honour to
Vasishtha.”
The second event has reference to the slaughter of the Brahmins
by, the Kshatriyas. It is related in the Adiparva of the Mahabharat
from which the following account is taken:
There was a king named Kritvirya, by whose liberality the
Bhrigus, learned in the Vedas, who officiated as his priests, had
been greatly enriched with corn and money. After he had gone
to heaven, his descendants were in want of money, and came to
beg for a supply from the Bhrigus, of whose wealth they were
aware. Some of the latter hid their money under ground, others
bestowed it on Brahmans, being afraid of the Kshatriyas, while
others again gave these last what they wanted. It happened,
however, that a Kshatriya, while digging the ground, discovered
some money buried in the house of a Bhrigu. The Kshatriyas then
assembled and saw this treasure, and, being incensed, slew in
consequence all the Bhrigus, whom they regarded with contempt,
down to the children in the womb. The widows, however, fled
to the Himalaya mountains. One of them concealed her unborn
child in her thigh. The Kshatriyas, hearing of its existence from
a Brahmani informant, sought to kill it; but it issued forth from
its mother’s thigh with lustre, and blinded the persecutors. After
wandering about bewildered among the mountains for a time, they
humbly supplicated the mother of the child for the restoration of
their sight; but she referred them to her wonderful infant Aurva
into whom the whole Veda, with its veda Vyas had entered, as
the person who (in requisition of the slaughter of his relatives)
had robbed them of their eyesight, and who alone could restore
it. They accordingly had recourse to him, and their eyesight was
restored. Aurva, however, meditated the destruction of all living
creatures, in revenge for the slaughter of the Bhrigus, and entered
on a course of austerities which alarmed both gods, asuras, and
men; but his progenitors (Pitris) themselves appeared, and sought
to turn him from his purpose by saying that they had no desire
to be revenged on the Kshatriyas: “It was not from weakness that
the devout Bhrigus overlooked the massacre perpetrated by the
PDF page 223 (printed page 208)
208 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
murderous Kshatriyas. When we became distressed by old age, we
ourselves desired to be slaughtered by them. The money which was
buried by some one in a Bhrigu’s house was placed there for the
purpose of exciting hatred, by those who wished to provoke the
Kshatriyas. For what had me, who were desiring heaven, to do
with money ?” They added that they hit upon this device because
they did not wish to be guilty of suicide, and concluded by calling
upon Aurva to restrain his wrath; and abstain from the sin he
was meditating: “Destroy not the Kshatriyas, O son, nor the seven
worlds. Suppress thy kindled anger which nullifies the power of
austere-fervour.” Aurva, however, replies that he cannot allow
his threat to remain unexecuted. His anger, unless wreaked upon
some other object, will, he says, consume himself. And he argues
on grounds of justice, expediency, and duty, against the clemency
which his progenitors recommend. He is, however, persuaded by
the Pitris to throw the fire of his anger into the sea, where they
say it will find exercise in assailing the watery element, and in
this way his threat will be fulfilled.”
The third event has reference to the slaughter of the Kshatriyas by
the Brahmins. This story is told in several places in the Mahabharata.
“The magnificent and mighty Kartavirya, possessing a
thousand arms, was lord of this whole world, living in Mahishmati.
This Haihaya of unquestioned valour ruled over the whole
sea-girt earth, with its oceans and continents”. He obtained
boons from the muni Dattatreya, a thousand arms whenever he
should go into battle power to make the conquest of the whole
earth, a disposition to rule it with justice and the promise of
instruction from the virtuous in the event of his going astray.
“Then ascending his chariot glorious as the resplendent sun, he
exclaimed in the intoxication of his prowess, ‘Who is like me in
fortitude, courage, fame, heroism, energy, and vigour?’ At the end
of this speech a bodiless voice in the sky addressed him: ‘Thou
knowest not, O fool, that a Brahman is better than a Kshatriya.
It is with the help of the Brahman that the Kshatriya rules
his subjects.’ Arjuna answers : ‘If I am pleased, I can create,
or, if displeased, annihilate, living beings; and no Brahman is
superior to me in act, thought or word. The first proposition is
that the Brahmans are superior; the second that the Kshatriyas
are superior; both of these thou hast stated with their grounds,
but there is a difference between them (in point of force). The
Brahmans are dependent on the Kshatriyas and not the Kshatriyas
are beaten up by the Brahmans, who wait upon them, and
only make the Vedas a pretence. Justice, the protection of the
PDF page 224
209
TOUCHABLES V/S UNTOUCHABLES
people, has its seat in the Kshatriyas. From them the Brahmans
derived their livelihood; how then can the latter be superior?
I always keep in subjection to myself those Brahmans, the
chief of all beings, who subsist on alms, and who have a high
opinion of themselves. For truth was spoken by that female the
Gayatri in the sky. I shall subdue all those unruly Brahmans
clad in hides. No one in the three worlds, god or man, can
hurl me from my royal authority; wherefore I am superior to
any Brahman. Now shall I turn the world in which Brahmans
have the upper hand into a place where Kshatriyas shall have
the upper hand; for no one dares to encounter my force in
battle.’ Hearing this speech of Arjuna, the female roving in the
night became alarmed. Then Vayu hovering in the air, said to
Arjuna: ‘Abandon this sinful disposition, and do obeisance to
the Brahmans. If thou shalt do them wrong, thy kingdom shall
be convulsed. They will subdue thee: those powerful men will
humble thee, and expel thee from thy country.’ The king asks
him, ‘Who art thou?’ Vayu replies, ‘I am Vayu, the messenger of
the gods, and tell thee what is for thy benefit.’ Arjuna rejoins,
‘Oh, thou displayest today a great warmth of devotion to the
Brahmans. But say that a Brahman is like (any other) earthborn creature.”
This king came into conflict with Parasuram the son of a Brahman
sage Jamadagni. The history of this conflict is as follows :
“There lived a king of Kanyakubja, called Gadhi, who had
a daughter named Satyavati. The marriage of this princess
to the rishi Richika, and the birth of Jamadagni, are then
told in nearly the same way as above narrated. Jamadagni
and Satyavati had five sons, the youngest of whom was the
redoubtable Parasuram. By his father’s command he kills his
mother (who, by the indulgence of impure desire, had fallen
from her previous sanctity), after the four elder sons had refused
this matricidal offence, and had in consequence been deprived of
reason by their father’s curse. At Parasuram’s desire, however,
his mother is restored by his father to life, and his brothers to
reason; and he himself is absolved from all the guilt of murder;
and obtains the boon of invincibility and long life from his
father. His history now begins to be connected with that of king
Arjuna (or Kartavirya). The latter had come to Jamadagni’s
hermitage, and had been respectfully received by his wife; but
he had requited this honour by carrying away by force the calf
of the sage’s sacrificial cow, and breaking down his lofty trees.
On being informed of this violence, Parasurama was filled with
indignation, attacked Arjuna. cut off his thousand arms, and slew
PDF page 225 (printed page 210)
210 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
him. Arjuna’s sons, in return, slew the peaceful sage Jamadagni,
in the absence of Parasurama.”
“Rama, after performing, on his return, his father’s funeral
obsequies, vowed to destroy the whole Kshatriya race; and executed
his threat by killing first Arjuna’s sons and their followers.
Twentyone times did he sweep away all the Kshatriyas from the
earth, and formed five lakes of blood in Samantapanchaka; in
which he satiated the manes of the Bhrigus, and beheld face to
face (his grand-father), Richika, who addressed himself to Rama.
The latter gratified Indra by offering to him a grand sacrifice,
and gave the earth to the officiating priests. He bestowed also
a golden altar, ten fathoms long and nine high, on the mighty
Kasyapa. This, by his permission, the Brahmans divided among
themselves, deriving thence the name of Khandavavanas. Having
given away the earth to Kasyapa, Parasurama himself dwells
on the mountain Mahendra. Thus did enmity arise between him
and Kshatriyas, and thus was the earth conquered by Rama of
boundless might.”
The Kshatriyas who were slain by Parasuram are described in the
Dronaparvan of the Mahabharat as of various provinces, viz., Kasmiras,
Darads, Kuntis, Kshudrakas, Malavas, Angas, Vangas, Kalingas, Videhas,
Tamraliptakas, Marttikavatas, Sivis and other Rajanyas.
The means by which the Kshattriya race was restored is also told
as part of this story of annihilation of the Kshatriyas by the Brahmins.
It is said:
“Having one and twenty times swept away all the Kshatriyas
from the earth, the son of Jamadagni engaged in austerities on
Mahendra the most excellent of mountains. After he had cleared
the world of Kshatriyas, their widows came to the Brahmans,
praying for offspring. The religious Brahmans, free from any
impulse of lust, cohabited at the proper seasons with these women,
who in consequence became pregnant, and brought forth valiant
Kshatriya boys and girls, to continue the Kshatriya stock. Thus
was the Kshatriya race virtuously begotten by Brahmans on
Kshatriya women, and became multiplied and long-lived. Thence
there arose four castes inferior to the Brahmans.”
zz