Vol. 6 · pages 551–555
The Evolution of Provincial Finance in British India; The Problem of the Rupee; other economic writings
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 551 (printed page 536)
536 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
silver on private account into India was prohibited on September
3, 1917. This measure, however, removed only a few of the
smaller competitors for the world’s diminished supply of silver,
and the world-demand remained so heavy that the Secretary of
State was unable to obtain sufficient supply notwithstanding the
great conservation effected in the use of silver by substituting
nickel coinage for silver coins of subsidiary order,* and by the
isue of notes of denominations as low as that of R. 1† and of
R. 2-8.‡ The Government of the United States was therefore
approached on the subject of releasing a portion of the silver
dollars held in their reserve. The American Government
consented and passed the Pittman Act, under which the
Government of India acquired a substantial volume at 101½
cents per fine ounce. The total silver purchased during this
period was as follows :—
TABLE XLIV
RUPEE COINAGE, 1915—20
Year
Silver purchased
in Open Market,
Standard Ounces.
Silver purchased
from U. S. A.,
Standard Ounces.
Total
Standard
Ounces.
1915-16 ... ... 8,636,000 ... ...
1916-17 ... ... 124,535,000 ... ...
1917-18 ... ... 70,923,000 ... ...
1918-19 ... ... 106,410,000 152,518,000 ...
1919-20 ... ... 14,108,000 60,875,000 ...
Total 324,612,000 213,393,000 538,005,000
Now, recalling the fact that from 1900 to 1914 the
Government had coined about 532 million standard
ounces of silver,§ it means that the coinage of silver by
Government during these five years exceeded the amount
coined in the fourteen preceding years by five million ounces.
* Act IV of 1918 and XXI of 1919.
† First issued on December 1, 1917.
‡ First put into circulation on January 2, 1918.
§ Cf. the figures given by L. Abrahms in his evidence to the Currency Committee
of 1919.—Mit. of Evid., Q. 37-41.
PDF page 552
537
STABILITY OF THE EXCHANGE STANDARD
Thus the fall in the gold value of the rupee is an
inevitable consequence of the exercise of the power to issue
inconvertible currency in unlimited quantities. This is the
fate of all inconvertible currencies known to history. But
it is said that an exception must be made in the case of
the rupee currency, for if the Government has the liberty
of issuing it in unlimited quantities it has also resources
to counteract the effects of a fall when it does occur. We
must therefore turn to an examination of these resources.
The basis of the reasoning is that the rupee is a token
currency, and that if the value of a token currency is
maintained at par with gold by applying to it the principle
of redemption into gold* it should be possible to maintain
the value of the rupee at par with gold by adopting a
similar mechanism. What is wanted is an adequate gold
fund, and so long as the Government has it, we are
assured that we need have no anxiety on the score of a
possible fall in the value of the rupee. Such a fund the
Government of India has, and on all the three occasions
when the gold value of the rupee fell below par that fund
was operated upon. The process of redemption is carried
on chiefly in three ways : (1) The sale of what are called
reverse councils, by which the Government receives rupees
in India in return for gold in London ; (2) the release
of gold internally in; receipt for rupees in India ; and
(3) the stoppage of the Secretary of State’s council bills
to prevent further rupees from going into circulation. The
cumulative effect of these, it is said, is to contract the
currency and raise its value to par. Although all the three
may be employed, the first is by far the most important
means adopted by the Government in carrying through
this process of redemption. The extent of the redemption
effected on the three occasions when it was employed may
be seen from the three following tables :—
* See the very interesting discussion by Laughlin of the laws of token money
in his Principles of Money, Chap. XV. It may be said in passing that Laughlin
is an opponent of the quantity theory of money, but in his discussion of token
money he virtually admits it.
PDF page 553 (printed page 538)
538 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
I. REDEMPTION OF CURRENCY, 1907-8
TABLE XLV
Date
By the sale of Reverse
Councils
By Release
of Gold-
Diminution
of Govt.
Stock of
Gold
during
the Month.
Private
Export of
Gold Coin
during
the
Month.
Drawings
of the Secretary of
State.
Amount
offered
Amount
sold
££ ££ £
1907—
September ... ... ... 152,000 14 858,896
October ... ... ... 254,000 9,109 921,678
November ... ... ... 532,000 3 427,344
December ... ... ... 338,000 2,501 571,905
1908—
March 26 ... 500,000 70,000 226,000 ... 172,669
(for the
whole
month)
April 2 ... 500,000 449,000
” 9 ... 500,000 340,000
” 16 ... 500,000 441,000 461,000 ... 66,834
” 23 ... 500,000 329,000
” 30 ... 500,000 205,000
May 7 ... 500,000 81,000
” 14 ... 500,000 145,000 645,000 ... 62,764
” 21 ... 820,000 793,000
” 28 ... 500,000 500,000
June 4 ... 1,000,000 755,000
” 11 ... 1,000,000 70,000 334,000 ... 169,810
” 18 ... 500,000 Nil
” 25 ... 500,000 50,000
July 2 ... 500,000 470,000
” 9 ... 500,000 304,000
” 16 ... 500,000 500,000 16,000 ... 186,847
” 23 ... 1,000,000 968,000
” 30 ... 1,000,000 860,000
Aug. 6 ... 1,000,000 418,000
” 13 ... 500,000 310,000 354,000 ... 262,217
” 20 ... 500,000 Nil
” 27 ... 500,000 Nil
Sept. 3 ... 500,000 Nil 502,000 ... 1,431,012
” 10 ... 500,000 Nil
Total ... 15,320,000 8,058,000 4,394,000 249,942
PDF page 554
539
STABILITY OF THE EXCHANGE STANDARD
II. R EDEMPTION IN 1914-16
TABLE XLVI
Date
Reverse
Councils
(in £ 000)
Drawings of the
S. of S.
(in Lakhs of Rs.)
1914. April ... ... Nil 270
May ... ... ” 61
June ... ... ” 68
July ... ... ” 66
August ... ... 2,778 72
September ... ... 1,515 25
October ... ... 1,895 41
November ... ... 1,044 32
December ... ... 1,250 30
1915. January ... ... 225 29
February ... ... Nil 181
March Total ... ” 287
8,707 1,162
1915. April ... ... Nil 1,53
May ... ... ” 1,03
June ... ... 651 17
July ... ... 3,377 8
August ... ... 815 23
September ... ... 50 2,17
October ... ... Nil 2,25
November ... ... ” 2,02
December ... ... ” 3,28
1916. January ... ... ” 5,26
February ... ... ” 6,02
March Total ” 6,33
... 4,893 30,37
PDF page 555 (printed page 540)
540 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
III. R EDEMPTION IN 1920
TABLE XLVII
SALE OF REVERSE COUNCILS (FIGURES IN THOUSANDS OF POUNDS)
Date of sale.
Amount
offered at
each Sale.
Amount
applied for
at each
Sale.
Amount
sold at
each Sale.
Progressive
Total of
Amount
sold.
1920. January 2 ... 1,000 770 770 770
” 8 ... 1,000 8,499 990 1,760
” 15 ... 2,000 300 300 2,060
” 22 ... 2,000 4,890 2,000 4,060
” 29 ... 2,000 1,334 5,000 5,394
February
5 ... 2,000 32,390 2,000 7,394
” 12 ... 2,000 41,312 2,000 12,394
” 19 ... 2,000 122,335 2,000 14,394
” 26 ... 2,000 78,417 2,000 16,394
March 3 ... 2,000 64,931 2,000 18,394
” 11 ... 2,000 117,185 2,000 20,394
” 18 ... 2,000 153,559 2,000 22,394
” 25 ... 2,000 56,295 2,000 24,394
” 31 ... 2,000 35,050 1,988 26,382
April 1 ...
” 8 ... 2,000 16,721 2,000 28,382
” 15 ... 2,000 48,270 2,000 30,382
” 22 ... 2,000 59,020 2,000 32,382
” 29 ... 1,000 53,210 1,000 33,382
May 6 ... 1,000 89,514 1,000 34,382
” 13 ... 1,000 101,625 1,000 35,382
” 20 ... 1,000 122,279 1,000 36,382
” 26 ... 1,000 85,620 1,000 37,382
June 3 ... 1,000 101,821 1,000 38,382
” 10 ... 1,000 109,245 1,000 39,382
” 15 ... 1,000 122,991 1,000 40,382
” 24 ... 1,000 73,391 1,000 41,382
July 1 ... 1,000 106,751 1,000 42,382
” 8 ... 1,000 63,690 1,000 43,382
” 15 ... 1,000 101,830 1,000 44,382
” 22 ... 1,000 103,960 1,000 45,382
” 29 ... 1,000 75,486 1,000 46,382
August 5 ... 1,000 101,260 1,000 47,382
” 12 ... 1,000 112,230 1,000 48,382
” 19 ... 1,000 114,767 1,000 49,382
” 26 ... 1,000 117,390 1,000 50,382
Sept. 2 ... 1,000 126,425 1,000 51,382
” 7 ... 1,000 117,200 1,000 52,382
” 13 ... 1,000 115,095 1,000 53,382
” 21 ... 1,000 122,590 1,000 54,382
” 28 ... 1,000 120,050 1,000 55,382