Vol. 9 · pages 351–355
What Congress and Gandhi Have Done to the Untouchables; Mr. Gandhi and the Emancipation of the Untouchables
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 351
322
DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR :
WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
State Congress.’ The leaders of this popular organisation belong
to the four major communities of the State, namely, the Nair,
Mahomedan, Christian and Ezhava community. The President
of the State Congress Mr. Thanu Pillai issued a statement in
which he stressed that special concessions would be given to the
Depressed Class. All the leaders of the Depressed Class have been
awaiting for a time to see the attitude of the State Congress. Now
we come to understand that there is no reality in the promise
of these leaders.
9. Now I am sure that the leaders have neglected the cause
of the Depressed Class. The State Congress was started on the
principles of nationalism and now it has become an institution
of communalism. Communal spirit is now working among the
leaders. In every public speech, statement or article, the leaders
mention only these four major communities, while they have no
thought on us. I fear, if this is the case of the leaders of the
political agitation of Travancore, the situation of the Depressed
Class will be more deplorable when the Responsible Government
is achieved, for the entire possession of the Government will be
then within the clutches of the above mentioned communities
and the Depressed Classes’ rights and privileges will be devoured
by the former. In the meetings of the working committee of the
States Congress, two-thirds of the time was devoted in discussion
concerning the strike of the Alleppey Coir Factories; but nothing
was mentioned in the meeting about the Harijan workers who
are undergoing manifold difficulties. The workers in Factories are
Savarnas and the agitation for obtaining Responsible Government
is a kind of anti-Harijan movement. The motive of every leader
of the State Congress is to improve the situation (circumstance)
of the Savarna. The leaders of the major communities have some
mercenary attitude who are going to sacrifice the Depressed for
their progress.
10. These are the conditions of the Depressed Class of the
State. What are the ways by which we have to establish our rights
in the State ? I humbly request you to be good enough to render
me your advice at this occasion. I am awaiting for the reply.
Excuse me for the trouble,
Yours faithfully,
SRINARAYANASWAMI.”
If the plan of Temple Entry is ultimately to deprive the
Untouchables of their statutory rights, then the movement is not
only not spiritual but it is positively mischievous and it would be
the duty of all honest people to warn the Untouchables.
PDF page 352
323
WHAT CONGRESS AND GANDHI HAVE DONE TO THE UNTOUCHABLES :
APPENDIX VI
APPENDIX VI
RECOGNITION OF UNTOUCHABLES
AS A SEPARATE ELEMENT
Pronouncements of the British Government on the position of
the Untouchables in the Constitution of India.
INTRODUCTION
The necessity for recalling the pronouncements of the Viceroys
and of the Secretaries of State has arisen because of the recent
criticism in the Press against the reply of 15th August 1944
given by Lord Wavell to Mr. Gandhi stating that the Scheduled
Castes are a separate element in the national life of India and
that their consent to the new Constitution was essential before
power is transferred to Indian hands. This criticism is based
upon the supposition that the Cripps’s proposals did not recognize
the Scheduled Castes as a separate element and did not make
their consent necessary. Reliance is placed upon the fact that the
Cripps’s proposals spoke of “racial and religious minorities” only
and it is argued that the Scheduled Castes are neither a racial
nor a religious minority.
It is hardly necessary to point out how ignorant this criticism
is. The Scheduled Castes are really a religious minority. The
Hindu religion by its dogma of untouchability has separated the
Scheduld Castes from the main body of the Hindus in a manner
which makes the separation far more real and far wider than
the separation which exists either between Hindus and Muslims
or Hindus and Sikhs or Hindus and Christians. It is difficult to
concede of a more effective method of separation and segregation
than the principle of untouchability and it is only those who
are actuated by malicious spirit of finding excuses to deny the
Scheduled Castes their claim to political rights would indulge
in this kind of jugglery. Those who regard the statement of
Lord Wavell as a new departure have completely forgotten what
attitude His Majesty’s Government has taken in the matter of
the Scheduled Castes from the very beginning when the transfer
of political power from British to Indian hands was thought of.
Ever since 1917 when the Montagu-Chelmsford Report advocated
responsible Government, the British Government have taken
a definite stand that they would, under no circumstances,
transfer power to Indian hands until they were satisfied that the
position of the Scheduled Castes was safeguarded by adequate
Constitutional provisions. A few of the many declarations made by
Secretaries of State and Viceroys of India from 1917 to 1941 are
collected together in the following pages. It will be found that the
PDF page 353
324
DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR :
WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
recognition that the Scheduled Castes are a separate and important
element in the national life of the country and that their consent
is necessary are in no way new proposals. Both the statements
have been made by responsible representatives of His Majesty’s
Government, viz., the Secretary of State and the Viceroy long
before the Cripps’s proposals came into being. Particular attention
is drawn to Mr. Amery’s statement on 14th August 1940 and Lord
Linlithgow’s statement on 10th January 1940. It is hoped that
a perusal of these declarations will enable those who are trying
to negative the claim of the Scheduled Castes for political rights
to realise that their propaganda is both foolish and malicious.
(1)
Extract from the Montagu-Chelmsford Report on Indian
Constitutional Reform—1917.
155 … … We have shown that the political education of the
ryot cannot be a very rapid, and may be a very difficult process.
Till it is complete, he must be exposed to the risk of oppression
by people who are stronger and cleverer than he is : and until it
is clear that his interests can safely be left in his own hands or
that the legislative councils represent and consider his interest, we
must retain power to protect him. So with the depressed classes.
We intend to make the best arrangements that we can for their
representation, in order that they too may ultimately learn the
lesson of self-protection. But if it is found that their interests
suffer and that they do not share in the general progress, we
must retain the means in our own hands of helping them.
* * *
(2)
Extract from the Fifth Despatch of the Government of India
dated 23rd April 1919 on the Report of the Southborough Committee
on Franchise.
13. We have analysed in the statement (printed at the top
of the next page) the interests which in the committee’s opinion
should be represented by non-official nomination.
We accept these proposals generally. But there is one
community whose case appears to us to require more consideration
than the committee gave it. The Report on Indian Constitutional
Reforms clearly recognizes the problem of the depressed classes
and gave a pledge respecting them. “We intend to make the best
arrangements that we can for their representation.” The castes
described as “Hindus—others” in the committee’s report, though
they are defined in varying terms, are broadly speaking all the same
kind of people. Except for differences in the rigidity of their ex-
PDF page 354
325
WHAT CONGRESS AND GANDHI HAVE DONE TO THE UNTOUCHABLES :
APPENDIX VI
Name of Province
Depressed Classes
Anglo-Indians
Indian Christians
Labour
Excluded Tracts
Military Interest
Industrial Interest other
than Planting & Mining
Aborigines
Domiciled Bengalis
Others
Total
Percentage of total
Membership
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Madras … … 2 — — — 2 — — — — 2 6 5
Bombay … … — 1 1 1 — — — — — 2 6 5
Bengal … … 1 — 1 1 — — — — — 22 5 4
United Provinces … 1 1 1 — — — — — — 2 5 4
Punjab … … — 2* 1 — — 1 — — — 2 6 7
Bihar and Orissa … 1 1 1 1 — — 1 1 1 2 9 9
Central Provinces … 1 1* — — 2 — — — — 1 5 7
Assam … … — 1* 1 1 1 — — — — 1 5 9
Total … … 7 7 6 4 5 1 1 1 1 14 47 —
* Europeans and Anglo-Indians.
clusion they are all more or less in the position of the Madras
Panchamas, definitely outside that part of the Hindu community
which is allowed access to their temples. They amount to about
one-fifth of the total population, and have not been represented
at all in the Morley-Minto Councils. The committee’s report
mentions the depressed classes twice, but only to explain that in
the absence of satisfactory electorates they have been provided
by nomination. It does not discuss the position of these people or
their capacity for looking after themselves. Nor does it explain
the amount of nomination which it suggests for them. Para 24
of the report justifies the restriction of the nominated seats on
grounds which do not suggest that the committee were referring
to the depressed classes. The measures of representation which
they propose for this community is as follows :—
— Total Population Population of Depressed Classes Total Seats Seats for Depressed Classes
(millions) (millions)
Madras … … … 39.8 6.3 120 2
Bombay … … 19.5 .6 113 1
Bengal … … … 45.0 9.9 127 1
United Provinces … 47.0 10.1 120 1
Punjab … … … 19.5 1.7 85 —
Bihar and Orissa … 32.4 9.3 100 1
Central Provinces … 12.2 3.7 72 1
Assam … … … 6.0 0.3 54 —
Total … … 221.4 41.9 791 7
PDF page 355
326
DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR :
WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
These figures speak for themselves. It is suggested that onefifth of the entire population of British India should be allotted
seven seats out of practically eight hundred. It is true that in
all the councils there will be roughly a one-sixth proportion of
officials who may be expected to bear in mind the interests of the
depressed ; but that arrangement is not, in our opinion, what the
Report on reforms aims at. The authors stated that the depressed
classes also should learn the lesson of self-protection. It is surely
fanciful to hope that this result can be expected from including
a single member of the community in an assembly where there
are sixty or seventy caste Hindus. To make good the principles of
paras 151, 152, 154 and 155 of the Report we must treat the outcastes more generously. We think there should be in each council
enough representatives of the depressed classes to save them from
being entirely submerged, and at the same time to stimulate some
capacity for collective action. In the case of Madras, we suggest
that they should be given six seats; in Bengal, the United Provinces
and Bihar and Orissa, we would give them four; in the Central
Provinces and Bombay two and elsewhere one. In these respects
we think that the committee’s report clearly requires modification.
* * *
(3)
Extract from Lord Birkenhead’s speech as Secretary of State
for India in the House of Lords on the 30th March 1927 on the
appointment of Statutory Commission.
* * *
…… Let me take the case of the depressed classes. There
is in India a vast population even in relation to the numbers
with which we are dealing, a population of sixty millions of the
depressed classes. Their condition is not quite as terrible, quite
as poignant as it has been in the past, but it is still terrible and
poignant. They are repelled from all social intercourse. If they
come between the gracious light of the sun and one who despised
them the sun is disfigured for that man. They cannot drink at
the public water-supply. They must make diversions of miles in
order to satisfy thirst and they are tragically known and they have
been known for generations as the “untouchables.” There are sixty
millions of them in India. Am I to have a representative of them
upon this Commission ? Never, never would I form a Commission
nor would anyone in a democratic country, nor would my friends
opposite recommend it, from which you have excluded a member
of this class which more than any other requires representation
if you are indeed to put the matter to a mixed jury of the kind
I am indicating.