Vol. 9 · pages 486–490
What Congress and Gandhi Have Done to the Untouchables; Mr. Gandhi and the Emancipation of the Untouchables
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 486
457
WHAT CONGRESS AND GANDHI HAVE DONE TO THE UNTOUCHABLES :
A PLEA TO THE FOREIGNER
Table 20
Classification of the Congress Members of the Provincial Legislatures in terms of Occupation
Province Lawyers
Medical
Practiti-
oners
Land-
lords
Business-
men
Private
Officials
Money
Lenders Nil Not Stated Total
Assam … … … 16 2 2 1 — — 3 9 33
Bengal … … … 9 2 16 5 2 — 16 4 54
Bihar … … … 14 4 56 6 3 — 1 14 98
Central Provinces … 20 2 25 10 — — 8 5 70
Madras … … … 52 2 45 18 2 1 3 36 159
Orissa … … … 8 1 17 4 4 1 1 — 36
PDF page 487
458
DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR :
WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
Table 21
Composition of the Cabinets in the Congress Provinces*
Province
Total No. of
Cabinet
Ministers
Total No. of
Non-Hindu
Ministers
Hindu Ministers in the Cabinet
Prime
Minister
Total Brahmins Non-Brahmins Scheduled Castes
Assam … … … … 8 3 5 ? ? Nil Brahmin
Bihar … … … … 4 1 3 ? ? 1 Brahmin
Bombay … … … … 7 2 5 3 2 Nil Brahmin
Central Provinces … … 5 1 4 3 1 Nil Brahmin
Madras … … … … 9 2 7 3 3 1 Brahmin
Orissa … … … … 3 Nil 3 ? ? ? Brahmin
United Provinces … … 6 2 4 4 Nil Nil Brahmin
* This table represent the position as it stood in May 1939 and as reported in the Issue of July 15, 1939, of the Indian Information.
Question mark indicates inability to classify whether Brahmin or non-Brahmin.
PDF page 488
459
WHAT CONGRESS AND GANDHI HAVE DONE TO THE UNTOUCHABLES :
A PLEA TO THE FOREIGNER
Table 22
Classification of Parliamentary Secretaries in Congress Provinces*
Province
Total No. of
Parliamentary
Secretaries
Total No. of
Non-Hindu
Parliamentary
Secretaries
Hindu Parliamentary Secretaries
Total Brahmins Non- Brahmins Scheduled Castes
Assam … … … … Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
Bihar … … … … 8 Nil 8 2 5 1
Bombay … … … … 6 Nil 6 1 5 Nil
Central Provinces … … Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
Madras … … … … 8 1 9 3 4 1
Orissa … … … … 3 Nil 3 ? ? Nil
United Provinces … … 12 1 11 2 8 1
Compiled from Indian Information Issue of July 15, 1939. Question mark indicates inability to classify whether Brahmin or non-Brahmin.
PDF page 489
460
DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR :
WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
the Cabinet. In all the Hindu Provinces, the Prime Ministers
were Brahmins. In all Hindu provinces, if the non-Hindu
ministers were excluded, the majority of ministers were
Brahmins and even parliamentary secretaries were Brahmins.
What has been said so far makes two things as clear as
daylight. First is that there is in India a well defined governing
class, distinct and separate from the servile class. Second is
that the governing class is so powerful that though small in
number in the elections of 1937 it quite easily captured political
power and established its supremacy over the servile classes.
There remains only one more point for me to establish to be
able to put my thesis across. It is to show how far Congress
was responsible for the victory of the governing class in the
elections of 1937. I know I must prove beyond reasonable doubt
that the Congress is responsible for placing the governing class
in the position of supremacy over the servile class. For it might
be said that the Congress had nothing to do with this, that
even if the Congress was responsible for it the result was an
accident and that there was no intention on the part of the
Congress to help the governing classes to win this position of
supremacy.
V
The first line of these suggested defences can be easily
disposed of. It is probable that those who raise this defence
do not know the political colour of the province to which the
figures given in Tables 19, 20, 21 and 22 relate. If they knew
it they would give up this line of defence. For they relate to
what are called the Congress Provinces. In these provinces
the majority party was the Congress Party and the Cabinets
were Congress Cabinets. Obviously, if in these Congress
provinces the governing classes succeeded in establishing
their rule over the servile classes it is difficult to see how
the Congress could be absolved from responsibility for such
a result. The Congress is a well disciplined party. It had a
plan for fighting the elections. In every province there was
established a Parliamentary Board, the functions of which
were (1) to choose candidates for elections, (2) to decide upon
the formation of Cabinets, and (3) to control the actions of
ministers. Over and above these Provincial Parliamentary
PDF page 490
461
WHAT CONGRESS AND GANDHI HAVE DONE TO THE UNTOUCHABLES :
A PLEA TO THE FOREIGNER
Boards there was a Central Parliamentary Board to superintend
and control the work of the Provincial Parliamentary Boards.
It was an election which was planned and controlled by the
Congress. It is therefore futile to argue that if the governing
classes captured power in the elections of 1937 in the Congress
Provinces the Congress is not responsible for the result.
The second line of defence is as fragile as the first. Those
who wish to argue that the dominance of the governing class in
the Congress provinces is accidental and not intentional should
know that they are advancing an argument which will not
stand. I would invite the attention of those who are inclined to
treat it as an accident to consider the following circumstances.
First let them consider the mentality of the leading members
of the Congress High Command who have guided the destiny
of the Congress in the past and who are at present running
the affairs of the Congress. It would be well to begin with
Mr. Tilak. He is dead. But while he was alive he was the
most leading man in the Congress and exercised the greatest
sway over it. Mr. Tilak was a Brahmin and belonged to the
governing class. Though he had acquired the reputation of
being the father of the Swaraj movement his antipathy to the
servile classes was quite well known. For want of space I will
cite only one instance of his mentality towards the servile
classes. In 1918, when the non-Brahmins and the Backward
classes had started an agitation for separate representation in
the legislature, Mr. Tilak in a public meeting held in Sholapur
said that he did not understand why the oil pressers, tobacco
shopkeepers, washermen, etc.—that was his description of the
Non-Brahmins and the Backward classes—should want to go
into the legislature. In his opinion, their business was to obey
the laws and not to aspire for power to make laws.
Next after Tilak I may take Mr. Vallabhbhai Patel.
Here again, I will cite only one instance to indicate his
mentality. In 1942, Lord Linlithgow invited 52 important
Indians representing different sections of the people to
discuss the steps that might be taken to make the Central
Government more popular and thereby enlist the sympathy
and co-operation of all Indians in war effort. Among those
that were invited were members belonging to the Scheduled
Castes. Mr. Vallabhbhai Patel could not bear the idea that the
Viceroy should have invited such a crowd of mean men. Soon