Vol. 9 · pages 51–55
What Congress and Gandhi Have Done to the Untouchables; Mr. Gandhi and the Emancipation of the Untouchables
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 51
22
DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR :
WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
mittee is found in the proceedings of the Congress Working
Committee held in Bombay in July 1922. At that meeting the
Committee passed the following resolution.:—
“That the General Secretary be asked to request Swami
Shradhanand to reconsider his resignation and withdraw it
and a sum of Rs. 500 be remitted to the Convener, Syt. G. B.
Deshpande, for the contingent expenses of the Depressed
Classes Sub-Committee.”
Here the matter ended, so far as the year 1922 was concerned.
Nothing further seems to have been done. The year 1923 came
on. Seeing that nothing was done to set going the Scheme for
ameliorating the condition of the Untouchables, the Working
Committee which met also at Gaya in January, 1923 took up the
matter and passed the following resolution :—
“With reference to Swami Shradhanand’s resignation,
resolved that the remaining members of the Depressed Classes
Sub-Committee do form the Committee and Mr. Yajnik be
the convener.”
Thereafter the All-India Congress Committee which met
Bombay in May 1923 passed the following resolution :—
“Resolved that the question of the condition of the
Untouchables be referred to the Working Committee for
necessary action.”
Here ends the second stage in the history of the resolution
remitting the question of the Untouchables to a special Committee.
The third stage in its history is marked by the resolution of the
Working Committee passed in May 1923 at its meeting held in
Bombay. This resolution ran as follows :—
“Resolved that while some improvement has been effected
in the treatment of the so-called Untouchables in response
of the policy of the Congress, this Committee is conscious
that much work remained yet to be done in this respect
and in as much as this question of untouchability concerns
the Hindu community particularly, it requests the All-India
Hindu Mahasabha also to take up this matter and to make
strenuous efforts to remove this evil from amidst the Hindu
Community.”
Thus is told the sad tale of the resolution and how it began
and how it ended. What shameful close to a flaring start!
It will be seen how the Congress washed its hands of the
problem of the Untouchables. It need not have added insult
PDF page 52 (printed page 23)
23WHAT CONGRESS AND GANDHI HAVE DONE TO THE UNTOUCHABLES :
A SHABBY SHOW
to injury by relegating it to the Hindu Mahasabha. There could
not be a body most unsuited to take up the work of the uplift
of the Untouchables than the Hindu Mahasabha. If there is any
body which is quite unfit for addressing itself to the problem of
the Untouchables, it is the Hindu Mahasabha. It is a militant
Hindu organization. Its aim and object is to conserve in every way
everything that is Hindu, religious and cultural. It is not a social
reform association. It is a purely political organization, whose
main object and aim are to combat the influence of the Muslims
in Indian politics. Just to preserve its political strength, it wants
to maintain its social solidarity, and its way to maintain social
solidarity is not to talk about caste or untouchability. How could
such a body have been selected by the Congress for carrying on the
work of the Untouchables passes my comprehension. This shows
that the Congress wanted somehow to get rid of an inconvenient
problem and wash its hands of it. The Hindu Mahasabha of
course did not come forth to undertake the work for it had no
urge for it and also because the Congress had merely passed a
pious resolution recommending the work to them without making
any promise for financial provision. So the project came to an
inglorious and an ignominious end:
Before closing this chapter, it would not be unprofitable
to ascertain why did the Congress abandon the work of social
amelioration of the Untouchables of which it had made so much
show ? Was it because the Congress intended that the scheme
should be a modest one not costing more than two to five lakhs of
rupees but felt that from that point of view they had made a mistake
in including Swami Shradhanand in the Committee and rather
than allow the Swami to confront them with a huge scheme which
the Congress could neither accept nor reject? The Congress thought
it better in the first instance to refuse to make him the convener 1
and subsequently to dissolve the Committee and hand over the
work to the Hindu Mahasabha. Circumstances are not quite against
such a conclusion. The Swami was the greatest and the most
sincere champion of the Untouchables. There is not the slightest
1 The fact that the Congress was keen on having Mr. Deshpande as the convener
shows that they did not like to leave matters in the hands of Swami Shradhanand.
The choice of Mr. Deshpande also indicates that they did not want anything to
be done for the simple reason that Mr. Deshpande was an Orthodox Brahmin
who had taken no interest in the welfare of the Untouchables.
PDF page 53
24
DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR :
WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
doubt that if he had worked on the Committee he would have
produced a very big scheme. That the Congress did not want him
in the Committee and was afraid that he would make big demand
on Congress funds for the cause of the Untouchables is clear
from the correspondence 1 that passed between him and Pandit
Motilal Nehru, the then General Secretary of the Congress, and
which is printed in the Appendix. If this conclusion is right, then
it shows how empty of sincerity were the words of the Congress
which passed that resolution.
Did the Congress abandon the programme because it was
revolutionary ? The resolution was in no sense a revolutionary
resolution. This will be clear from the note which the Working
Committee had appended to the resolution and which the All-India
Congress Committee had approved. The note said :—
“Whilst therefore in places, where the prejudice against
the Untouchables is still strong separate schools and separate
wells must be maintained out of Congress funds, every effort
should be made to draw such children to national schools
and to persuade the people to allow the Untouchables to use
the common wells.”
Obviously, the Congress was not out for the abolition of
Untouchability. It had accepted the policy of separate schools and
separate wells. The resolution did no more than to undertake
amelioration of the condition of the Untouchables. And even such
a timid and mild programme the Congress was unable to carry
through and which it gave up without remorse or shame.
II
Did the Congress abandon the programme because it had no
funds ? Quite the contrary. The Congress had started the Tilak
Swaraj Fund in 1921. How much money did the Congress collect?
The following table will give some idea. Rupees one crore and
thirty lakhs were contributed by the public to the fund. The fund
was collected to carry out Congress propaganda and to finance
the constructive programme of the Congress as drafted by the
Working Committee at Bardoli. How was this huge amount
spent by the Congress? Some idea as to the purposes on which
the money out of this fund was spent can be gathered from the
list of grants voted by the Working Committee during the years
1921, 1922 and 1923.
1 Appendix I.
PDF page 54 (printed page 25)
25WHAT CONGRESS AND GANDHI HAVE DONE TO THE UNTOUCHABLES :
A SHABBY SHOW
Table 1
TILAK SWARAJ FUND*
RECEIPTS
1921 1922 1923 Total
Rs. a. P. Rs. a. P. Rs. a. P. Rs. a. P.
General Collections Annexure No. 1 ... 64,31,779 15 10 3,92,430 2 6½ 2,64,288 9 1 70,88,498 11 5½
Specific (ear-marked) Donations or
Grants Annexure No. II
... ...
37,32,230 2 10½ 9,45,552 1 4½ 7,10,801 10 3 53,88,583 14 6
1,01,64,010 2 8½ 13,37,982 3 11 9,75,090 3 4 1,24,77,082 9 11½
Add—Miscellaneous Receipts, Interest,
Other Funds, Famine, Flood, Pro-
vincial Membership, Delegation,
Affiliation, etc., for 1921-23 ... ... — — — 5,42,332 5 7½
1,30,19,415 1,5 7
* The Indian Annual Register —1923, p. 112.
PDF page 55
26
DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR :
WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
I. Grants Voted in 1921 1
I. Grants voted by the Working Committee at its meeting
held in Calcutta on January 31st and February 1st, 2nd and
3rd 1921 :—
1. Rs. 1,00,000 to remain at the disposal of Mahatma Gandhi
for the support of lawyers who give up their practice and stand
in need of support ( iv).
2. Read the following telegram dated the 31st January 1921
from Syt. C. Rajagopalachariar :—
“Regret unable to attend meeting. Selected full time
public workers for Tamil, Kerala part Karnatak about
hundred, of whom about forty lawyers suspending practice.
Pending collection Tilak Fund sanction drawing Rs. 5,600
per month. Students’ movement progressing rapidly though
newspapers do not show up news. Must carry on against
parental opposition, least two months. Must draw three
thousand per month for this. Committee must immediately
wire authority issuing Swarajya Fund receipts in name of
Congress for convenient denominations like Khilafat receipts.
Confident to make up all advances in three months. Do not
hope large sums Madras.”
Resolved that a sum of Rs. 8,600 be advanced to Tamil, Kerala
and the Karnatak parts of the Madras Presidency for one month
for the present, and for future advances the matter be placed
before the next meeting of the Working Committee ( xx).
II. Grants voted by the Working Committee at its meeting
held at Bezwada on the 31st March and 1st April 1921 :—
3. A lump sum of Rs. 6,000 be advanced to Pandit Mohanlal
Nehru, Secretary, U.P. Provincial Congress Committee, for carrying
on propaganda and collecting funds ( v).
“4. Rs. 17,000 be sanctioned for the remainder of the
current year for the expenses of the office of the President, the
Secretaries, the Cashier, and that out of the above a sum of
Rs. 300 per mensem be assigned to Mr. C. Rajagopalachariar
for the expenses of his secretary and the President’s stenotypist (vii) .
5. A sum of 1,000 dollars remitted by cable to Mr. D.
V. S. Rao of the India Home Rule League of America, 1,400
Broadway, New York ( viii).”
III. The Working Committee at its resolution No. 18
dated 31st July 1921 appointed a Grants Sub-Committee to
1 Roman figures in the brackets after each grant refer to the resolution of the
Working Committee by which the grant was made.