Vol. 9 · pages 86–90
What Congress and Gandhi Have Done to the Untouchables; Mr. Gandhi and the Emancipation of the Untouchables
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 86
57
WHAT CONGRESS AND GANDHI HAVE DONE TO THE UNTOUCHABLES :
A MEAN DEAL
imagining what his position was going to be. The meeting of
the Federal Structure Committee held on the 17th of September
1931 provided him the necessary occasion. The agenda for
the meeting included the question of election of members of
the Federal Legislatures. Expressing his views on the subject,
Mr. Gandhi made the following statement:—
“I come to sub-head ( v)—representation by special
constituencies of special interests. I here speak for the
Congress. The Congress has reconciled itself to special
treatment of the Hindu-Muslim-Sikh tangle. There are sound
historical reasons for it but the Congress will not extend
that doctrine in any shape or form. I listened to the list of
special interests. So far as the Untouchables are concerned,
I have not yet quite grasped what Dr. Ambedkar has to
say : but of course the Congress will share the honour with
Dr. Ambedkar of representing the interests of the
Untouchables. They are as clear to the Congress as the
interests of any other body or of any other individual
throughout the length and breadth of India. Therefore I
would most strongly resist any further special representation.”
This was nothing but a declaration of War by Mr. Gandhi and
the Congress against the Untouchables. In any case it resulted
in a war between the two. With this declaration by Mr. Gandhi,
I knew what Mr. Gandhi would do in the Minorities Committee
which was the main forum for the discussion of this question.
Mr. Gandhi was making his plans to bypass the Untouchables
and to close the communal problem by bringing about a settlement
between the three parties, the Hindus, the Muslims and the Sikhs.
He had been carrying on negotiations privately with the Muslims
before the Minorities Committee met, but evidently they had not
been concluded. Consequently, when the Minorities Committee
met on 28th September 1931, Sir Ali Imam representing the
Nationalist Muslim point of view started the debate. He began
by saying :—
“I am personally not aware if there are any negotiations
going on so far as the Muslim Delegation is concerned.
I have had no opportunity of knowing that there are
any proposals at present that are under consideration.
It may be, as I have heard generally, that some kind of
understanding may be arrived at. I do not vouch for it;
I know nothing about it. If you desire, Sir, that I should
put before you the Muslim Nationalists’ point of view,
I shall be ready to do so ; but of course, I must have
PDF page 87
58
DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR :
WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
your permission, because it may take a little time and economy
of time in a meeting like this is one’s principal aim.
“Chairman: The point is that this Committee’s business
is very strictly limited to a consolidation of the Minorities
problem.
Sir Ali Imam: It is from that point of view that I shall
approach the subject.
Chairman : If there is no other official intervention shall
I call on Sir Ali Imam ?”
Then followed His Highness the Aga Khan who said :—
“I believe that Mahatma Gandhi is going to see the Muslim
Delegation to-night. We hope to-night to have a friendly talk
with our friend. That is all that I can tell you as far as any
possible negotiation is concerned.”
Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya also suggested that a short
adjournment may be fruitful of results. Knowing that this was a
mischievous move I got up and spoke as follows :—
“I should like to say one word before we adjourn. As
regards your suggestion—that while these negotiations are
going on members of the other minority communities should
prepare their case—I should like to say that so far as the
Depressed Classes are concerned, we have already presented
our case to the Minorities Sub-Committee last time.
“The only thing which remains for me to do is to put
before this Committee a short statement 1 suggesting the
quantum of representation which we want in the different
Legislatures. Beyond that I do not think I am called upon to
do anything; but the point I am anxious to make at the very
outset is this. I have heard with great pleasure that further
negotiations are going to take place for the settlement of
the communal issue, but I would like to make our position
clear at the very start. I do not wish any doubt should be
left on this question. Those who are negotiating ought to
understand that they are not plenipotentiaries appointed by
the Committee to negotiate a settlement; that whatever may
be the representative character of Mr. Gandhi or of the other
parties with whom he wishes to negotiate, they certainly are
not in a position to bind us— certainly not. I say that most
emphatically in this meeting.
“Another thing I want to say is this—that the claims put
forward by the various minorities are claims put forward by
them irrespective of the consideration as to whether the claims
that they have put forward are consistent with the claims of
the other minorities. Consequently, any settlement which takes
1 This I did by putting in another memorandum which is included as Appendix II.
PDF page 88
59
WHAT CONGRESS AND GANDHI HAVE DONE TO THE UNTOUCHABLES :
A MEAN DEAL
place between one minority on the one hand and the Congress
or any other party for the matter of that on the other hand,
without taking into consideration the claims which have been
put forward by other minorities, can have no binding force as
far as I am concerned. I have no quarrel with the question
whether any particular community should get weightage or
not, but I do want to say most emphatically that whoever
claims weightage and whoever is willing to give that weightage
he must not give it—he cannot give it—out of my share. I
want to make that absolutely plain.”
What followed will be clear from the extract from the
proceedings given, below :—
“Chairman: Do not let there be any misunderstanding.
This is the body before which the final settlement must come,
and the suggestion is merely that if there are minorities or
communities that hitherto have been in conflict with each
other they should use a short time for the purpose of trying
to overcome their difficulties. That will be a step and a very
important and essential step, towards a general agreement,
but the agreement is going to be a general one.
Dr. Ambedkar : I have made my position absolutely clear.
“Chairman: Dr. Ambedkar’s position has been made
absolutely clear; in his usual splendid way he has left no
doubt at all about it, and that will come up when this body
resumes its discussion. What I would like to do is to get you
all to feel that we are co-operating together for a general
Settlement; not for a settlement between any two or any
three, but a complete settlement.
“Chairman: The position is this. We will adjourn now,
I think, and later continue our meetings. Pending any
negotitions that may be going on between any two or any three
of you, we can take up the time in listening to a statement
of the claims of the other minorities. I think that would be
very useful. It would save time, and it would not mar the
possibility of any harmony that may be reached between, say,
our Sikh friends—who, we know, can look after themselves
with a great deal of persistence—Mr. Gandhi and his friends
and the Aga Khan and his.
“Dr. Ambedkar: I should like to Suggest whether it
would not be possible for you to appoint a small Committee
consisting of members drawn from the various minority
communities, along with the Congress representatives, to
sit in an informal manner and discuss this problem during
the period of the adjournment.
PDF page 89
60
DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR :
WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
“Chairman: I was going to make this suggestion. Do not
ask me to appoint that Committee; do it yourselves. I have
invited you to get together. Could not you manage to hold
an informal meeting amongst yourselves and talk the matter
over, and then when you speak here you will speak with
some sort of knowledge of the effect of what you are saying
on others ? Could we leave it in that way ?
“Dr. Ambedkar: As you like.
“Chairman : That would be far better.”
No settlement was evidently arrived at between the three
parties during the adjournment. Consequently when the Minorities
Committee met again on 1st October 1931, Mr. Gandhi said :—
“Prime Minister, after consultation with His Highness
the Aga Khan and other Muslim friends last night, we came
to the conclusion that the purpose for which we meet here
would be better served if a week’s adjournment was asked
for. I have not had the opportunity of consulting my other
colleagues, but I have no doubt that they will also agree in
the proposal I am making.”
The proposal was seconded by the Aga Khan. I got up to
oppose the motion. What I said will be clear from the following
extract from the proceedings :—
“Dr. Ambedkar: I do not wish to create any difficulty in
our making every possible attempt to arrive at some solution
of the problem with which this Committee has to deal, and
if a solution can be arrived at by the means suggested by
Mahatma Gandhi, I, for one, will have no objection to that
proposal.
“But there is just this one difficulty with which I, as
representing the Depressed Classes, am faced. I do not know
what sort of committee Mahatma Gandhi proposes to appoint
to consider this question during the period of adjournment,
but I suppose that the Depressed Classes will be represented
on this Committee.
“Mr. Gandhi: Without doubt.
“Dr. Ambedkar: Thank you. But I do not know whether in
the position in which I am today it would be of any use for
me to work on the proposed Committee. And for this reason.
Mahatma Gandhi told us on the first day that he spoke in the
Federal Structure Committee that as a representative of the
Indian National Congress he was not prepared to give political
recognition to any community other than the Muhammadans
and the Sikhs. He was not prepared to recognize the AngloIndians, the Depressed Classes, and the Indian Christians.
PDF page 90
61
WHAT CONGRESS AND GANDHI HAVE DONE TO THE UNTOUCHABLES :
A MEAN DEAL
I do not think that I am doing any violence to etiquette by
stating in this Committee that when I had the pleasure of
meeting Mahatma Gandhi a week ago and discussing the
question of the Depressed Classes with him, and when we,
as members of the other minorities, had the chance of talking
with him yesterday in his office, he told us in quite plain terms
that the attitude that he had taken in the Federal Structure
Committee was a firm and well considered attitude. What I
would like to say is that unless at the outset I know that the
Depressed Classes are going to be recognised as a community
entitled to political recognition in the future Constitution of
India, I do not know whether it will serve any purpose for me
to join the committee that is proposed by Mahatma Gandhi
to be constituted to go into this matter. Unless, therefore, I
have an assurance that this Committee will start with the
assumption that all those communities which the Minorities
Sub-Committee last year recommended as fit for recognition
in the future constitution of India will be included, I do not
know that I can whole-heartedly support the proposition for
adjournment, or that I can whole heartedly co-operate with
the Committee that is going to be nominated. That is what
I wish to be clear about.
* * *
“Dr. Ambedkar: I should like to make my position further
clear. It seems that there has been a certain misunderstanding
regarding what I said. It is not that I object to adjournment;
it is not that I object to serving on any Committee that might
be appointed to consider the question. What I would like to
know before I enter upon this committee, if they give me
the privilege of serving on it, is : What is the thing that this
Committee is going to consider ? Is it only going to consider
the question of the Muhammadans vis-a-vis the Hindus ?
Is it going to consider the question of the Muhammadans
vis-a-vis the Sikhs in the Punjab ? Or is it going to consider
the question of the Christians, the Anglo-Indians and the
Depressed Classes ?
“If we understand perfectly well before we start that this
committee will not merely concern itself with the question
of the Hindus and the Muhammadans, of the Hindus and
the Sikhs, but will also take upon itself the responsibility
of considering the case of the Depressed Classes, the AngloIndians and the Christians, I am perfectly willing to allow this
adjournment resolution to be passed without any objection. But
I do want to say this, that if I am to be left out in the cold and
if this interval is going to be utilised for the purposes of solving
the Hindu-Muslim question, I would press that the Minorities