Vol. 10 · pages 316–320
As Member of the Governor-General's Executive Council, 1942–46
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 316
299
STATE’S OBLIGATIONS TO LABOUR
Government think it enough not to do anything more than to
change the name of the organisation as recommended by the
Committee. The Conference is meeting under different names,
such as Ministers’ Conference, Tripartite Conference and Plenary
Conference. I am glad that the Committee decided to call it the
‘Labour Conference’. Notwithstanding what Shakespeare has
said there is much in a name. The name ‘Labour Conference’
may not have a partite’ or ‘Plenary’. The only comment I have
to make is that the name as proposed by the Committee lacks
colouring—a defect which could be easily removed if instead of
calling it ‘Labour Conference’ we decided to call it the ‘ Indian
Labour Conference’. I take it that you are in agreement with
me on this point.
“There is another thing which Government propose to do,
which is quite independent of the report. It is to enlarge the
functions of this Conference.
“At the last I.L.O. Conference held in Paris the delegate
of the Government of India gave an undertaking to place all
recommendations and Conventions passed by the I.L.O., before,
this body for discussion. The Government of India have decided
to honour that undertaking. I am sure you will welcome this
extension of your powers and functions. It will enable the
Provinces and States to know what was done at each Session of
the I.L.O. and profit by the views of the employers and employees
in regard to it.”
CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS
The Indian Labour Conference, consisting of the representatives
of Central and Provincial Governments, important states and
employers’ and workers’ organisations unanimously supported the
principle of the 48-hour week in India’s factories at its meeting
on November 27. There was, more or less, complete agreement in
regard to the Government’s proposals for the statutory provision
of industrial canteens and for the amendment of the Workmen’s
Compensation Act, 1934.
The Labour Department’s memorandum on the reduction
of working hours pointed out that it was both unjust and
unwise to deny the workers a reasonable amount of spare
time away from the factory, which was indispensable for
the building up of citizenship and for the maintenance
PDF page 317 (printed page 300)
300 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
of his physical efficiency. It emphasised that the present was
an opportune moment for taking up this question because there
was a need for giving relief to factory workers who had been
put to a great strain during the war. Moreover, shorter hours
would lead to greater employment. The memorandum made it
clear that the reduction in hours should not be accompanied
by any reduction in basic wages or dearness allowances unless
there was a fall in prices. The rates of piece-workers should be
adjusted on the principle that a piece-worker should earn not
less than a time worker.
The Conference also discussed the organisation and functions
of the Employment Exchanges set up by the Labour Department
to help the resettlement and employment of demobilised Services
personnel and discharged war workers during the transition
period.
The Labour Department’s memorandum on the subject
recorded that Employment Exchanges can only give useful
assistance if they are in possession of information regarding the
employment opportunities available or likely to be available. The
use of the Employment Exchange organisation, it continued, will
prove of mutual benefit to employers and employment-seekers
and will ensure satisfactory distribution of manpower among
various branches of production. It will also facilitate the mobility
of Labour, both occupational and geographical, and will obviate
any bottle-necks in the supply of various categories of workers.
The attitude of Employment Exchanges during strikes or
lockouts and the question of compensation to the workers during
involuntary unemployment resulting from controls were the two
other subjects considered in today’s session. The first subject was
adjourned after some discussion for tomorrow’s session, and on
the second the Conference was not able to arrive at an agreed
decision.
Minimum Wages
When the Conference assembled on November 28 to conclude its
seventh session, the Hon’blc Dr. B. R. Ambedkar announced that
a committee consisting of two representatives of employers and
two of employees will be formed shortly to advise the Government
in drafting legislation for fixing minimum wages for labour and
for amending the Indian Trade Unions’ Act, 1926.
PDF page 318
301
STATE’S OBLIGATIONS TO LABOUR
Though the principles of these two measures were agreed to
by the Conference, various points of view were expressed during
the discussions. The appointment of the Committee is to meet
the point raised by many speakers at the Conference that, in
view of the importance of these two measures, they should be
examined in detail.
The Conference was unanimous in its decision regarding the
framing of standing orders in industrial concerns and on the
attitude that should be adopted by the Employment Exchanges
during strikes or lock-outs. It was agreed that, during strikes
or lockouts, Employment Exchanges should acccept vacancies
and inform suitable applicants of the existence of the trade
dispute before submission. They should register workmen and
submit them for other employment, informing the prospective
employers that they are unemployed as the result of an existing
trade dispute.
zz
PDF page 319
53
* Multi-purpose Plan for Development of
Orissa’s Rivers
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar’s Speech at Cuttack
“Orrisa wants to get rid of the evils of floods. Orissa
wants to get rid of malaria and other—to use American
phraseology—‘low-income’ diseases causing ill-health and
corroding the stamina of her people. Orissa wants to raise the
standard of living of her people and advance their prosperity
by irrigation, by navigation and by producing cheap electrical
power. All these purposes can fortunately be achieved by one
single plan, namely to build reservoirs and store the water
which is flowing in her rivers”
Thus observed the Hon’ble Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, Labour
Member to the Government of India, in his Presidential
address at a conference held in Cuttack on November 8
between the representatives of the Central Government and the
Governments of Orissa, the Central Provinces and the Eastern
Slates, to discuss the possibilities of developing Orissa rivers.
Orissa’s Problems
Referring to the problems of Orissa, the Labour Member
observed : “To say that the problem is one of floods is both
an oversimplification and an understatement of the problem. I
see the problem in somewhat different light. When I think of
Orissa, the picture that comes to my mind is that of a people
subject not to one affliction, but many.
“One such affliction, which is on the lips of everybody, is the
constant exposure of her people to floods which cause damage to life
and property and, in a general sense, insecurity. This affliction is due,
not merely to floods, but also to droughts and famines. Damage by
* Indian Information, December 15, 1945, pp. 692-95.
PDF page 320
303
MULTI-PURPOSE PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT OF ORISSA’S RIVERS
droughts and famines can be as great as that caused by floods.
It is said that in the drought of 1866, nearly 40 per cent
of the population of Puri district perished.
“Deterioration in health is another affliction of the people
of Orissa. The total population of the province of Orissa is 77 1/2
lakhs. According to the health report of the province, the total
deaths in 1944 were 2,35,581. Of these, 1,30,000 died from
some kind of fevers and a majority by malarial fever. This
means that three per cent of her people died in 1944, and of
these nearly half died of malaria. This is a very high figure.
In 1944, 19 per cent of the student population was found to
show distinct signs of malnutrition and 8.7 per cent showed
signs of vitamin deficiency.
“If these facts arc true, Orissa cannot be said to be above
the poverty line. The third affliction of Orissa—I think it could
be called an affliction—is its want of internal communications.
Orissa is a locked-up country. Except for the solitary railway
line, running along her eastern sea coast, there is no means
of communication either by railway or by canal to connect the
vast hinterland with the sea coast.”
“Should Orissa continue to be in such a wretched state as
it is today ?” Dr. Ambedkar asked. “It need not. It has natural
resources, and they are by no means meagre. Orissa has coal,
Orissa has irion, chrome, graphite, bauxite, limestone, mica,
and Orissa has also bamboo, to mention only some of its
important natural resources.”
“There is another precious possession which Orissa has,
namely her water wealth. The amount of water that passes
through the Orissa delta is just vast. The delta—comprising
roughly the three districts of Cuttack, Puri and Balasore and
covering an area of about 8,000 square miles—is traversed by
a network of distributaries arising mainly from three rivers,
the Mahanadi, the Brahmani, and the Baitarani.
“Two more rivers—the Burabalang and the Subarnarekha—
of relatively lesser importance, also pass through the delta. The
three main rivers referred to above drain an area of 69,000
square miles above the delta, lying in the Eastern States,
Central Provinces and Bihar. Of these the Mahanadi—the
largest of the three—drains 51,000 square miles. Between
them, these three rivers carry each year to the sea a discharge
of about 90 million acre feet.”