Library › Vol. 15

Vol. 15 · pages 416–420

As Free India's First Law Minister and Member of Opposition in Parliament, 1947–1956

This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.

PDF page 416 (printed page 399)

Open the original page

399PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES miss the whole thing. Is there any other member wishing to move any other amendment ? Shri Hiray (Bombay): Yes, Sir. Mr. Speaker: In addition to what the Law Minister is accepting ? Shri Hiray: Yes. Dr. Ambedkar: What has happened on account of the decision relating to Dangs is that one more seat has been added to Maharashtra and that seat belongs to the Tribal people. Therefore a seat has to be provided in the constituencies that have been delimited so far as Maharashtra is concerned. This is the proposal which stands in the name of Mr. Hiray. Either he may move it or I may move it. Mr. Speaker: It is better if the Hon. Minister moves it. Dr. Ambedkar: I beg to move: In Table B, page 8, Nasik District, in column I, for the words “Nasik urban” and “Nasik rural cum Igatpuri”, substitute the words “Nashik Igatpuri “and against the same constituencies.— (1) In column 2, omit all the words beginning with “Nasik Municipal” and ending with “Iatpuri Municipal area” and substitute “Nasik and Igatpuri Talukas including all Municipalities therein”. (2) In columns 3, 4, 5 omit the figurs given therein and substitute 3, 1, 1 instead respectively. Shri Kanhayala Desai (Bombay): There is a consequential amendment relating to Pardi. One scheduled tribe seat which is at present in Pardi Taluka should be removed and it should become a general seat. Dr. Ambedkar: That becomes consequential. That you can do, Sir. Mr. Speaker: Let it go on record that a specific point was raised. * Mr. Speaker : The amendment of Dr. Ambedkar about Dangs. (as mentioned above). The motion was adopted. * P. D., Vol. 13, Part II, 9th June 1951, pp. 10534-35.

PDF page 417 (printed page 400)

Open the original page

400 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES Shri Hiray : There is my consequential amendment in List No. 11. Mr. Speaker: That is with reference to having one seat from Maharashtra. That is purely consequential and we will accept it as such. The Hon. Law Minister wishes to have the leave of the House to withdraw amendments Nos. 1, 2 and 4 in List No. 8 and all the other hon. Members wish to have the leave of the House to withdraw the various amendments and motions standing in their names. The amendments were by leave withdrawn. [MR. DEPUTY SPEAKER IN THE CHAIR] MADHYA PRADESH ORDER Dr. Ambedkar: The amendments I am prepared to accept are these: List No. 1. —Amendments Nos. 6 and 8 in the name of Kishorimohan Tripathi and others. List No. 2. —Amendment No. 1, parts 1 to 5 of Dr. P. S. Deshmukh and others together with two consequential amendments to be moved by Dr. Deshmukh. List No. 3. —Amendment No. 2 in the name of Shri Kishormohan Tripathi and others together with a consequential amendment to be moved by Shri Tripathi. (Amendment No. 2 is to be slightly modified so as to read “Khamaria R.I.C. of Khamaria Tehsil)” for “Khamaria Tehsil”. List No. 6. —Amendment Nos. 1 to 5. * Shri Jangde: Sir, I want to withdraw my amendments. Mr. Deputy Speaker: I will later ask leave of the House for the withdrawal. I will now put amendments No. 1 to 5 in list No. 6. Have they any consequential amendments ? Dr. Ambedkar: There, are no amendments to these amendments Nos. 1 to 5. Mr. Deputy Speaker: The question is: [For text of the motions see Dr. Ambedkars amendments Nos. 1 to 5 in List No. 6 printed in Appendix XXXIII, annexure No. 3.] The motion was adopted. * P. D. Vol. 13, Part II, 9th June 1950, p. 10541.

PDF page 418 (printed page 401)

Open the original page

401PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES *Dr. Deshmukh: I have to move my amendments. Mr. Deputy Speaker: Yes, That is with reference to amendment No. 1 in List No. 2. Dr. Ambedkar: There are amendments to his amendments Nos. 1 to 5 of List 2. **Mr. Deputy Speaker: To this extent the President’s Order stands modified. Leave may be granted to all the Members to withdraw their amendments. All the other amendments moved by other hon. Members were, by leave withdrawn. Mr. Deputy Speaker: The Madhya Pradesh Order is over. Dr. Ambedkar: There are other friends who are pressing me that their matter may be taken up first, that is West Bengal and Hyderabad. Mr. Deputy Speaker: I am taking up Madras. MADRAS ORDER Dr. Ambedkar: With regard to the Madras Order, I am prepared to accept the following amendments:— List No. 4. — Amendmnt No. 1, part 3, second alternative, and part 4, of Shri Kala Venkatarao. Amendment No. 2, parts 1 and 2, of Shri Keshava Rao. List No. 6.— Amendment No. 1, Parts 1 and 2, of Shri Sanjivaya, subject to the recast of part 2 as follows : “That for all the entries against “Erode” in columns 2, 3, 4 and 5 the following be substituted : 1 2 345 Erode … Erode taluk, Bhavani taluk, Dhara-puram taluk [excluding such of the villages of Kundadam Firka as are specified in item No. (19) of the Appendix] and Kugalur Firka and such of the villages of Gobichetti-palayam Firka of Gobichettipala-yam taluk of Coimbatore district as are specifed in item No. (18) of the Appendix ; and Karur taluk Kattalai, Kulithalai and Panjarpatti Firkas of Kulithalai taluk of Tiruchirapalli district. 2 1… * P. D. Vol. 13, Part II, 9th June 1950, p. 10543. ** Ibid., pp. 10545-47.

PDF page 419 (printed page 402)

Open the original page

402 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES List No. 11.— Amendment No. 2, parts 1 to 3, by Shri Kodandarama Reddy and others. List No. 12. —Amendments Nos. 1 to 13, subject to amendment No. 6 being modified by Hon. Minister of Law as follows;— That for all the entries against “Tiruppur” in volumns 2, 3, 4 and 5the follwoing be substituted : — 1 2 345 Tiruppur The Kollegal, Gobichettipalayam and Tiruppur taluks and Savur and Avanashi firkas of Avanashi taluk (excluding the Kugalur firka and such of the villages of Gobichettipalayam firka of the Gopichetti-palayam taluk as are specified in item No. (18) of the Appendix and the the Varapatti firka of Tiruppur taluk) of the Coimbatore District. 1 …… I beg to move: (i) At page 4 in Table A.—Parliamentary Constituencies, against the entry ‘Dharmapuri “for the words “and Edappadi firka of Tiruchengoda taluka of Salem District” substitute the words “and Edappadi firka and such of the villages of Sankagiri firka of Tiruchengode taluk of Salem District as are specified in item 18A of the Appendix”. (ii) At page 4, in Table A.—Parliamentary Constituencies, against the entry “Tiruchengoda” for the words “(excluding Edappadi firka of Tiruchengoda taluk)” substitute the words “(excluding Edappadi firka and such of the villages of Sankagiri firka of Tiruchengode taluk as are specified in item 18A of the Appendix)”. (iii) At page 11 in Table B.—Assembly Constituencies, against the entry “Tiruchengode”, for the entry in column 2, substitute the following: “Tiruchengode taluk (excluding Edappadi firka and such of the villages of Sankagiri firka and of the Tiruchengode firka as are specified in items (18A) and (16) respectively of the Appendix)”. (iv) At page 11 in Table B.—Assembly Constituencis, against the entry “Edappadi”, for the entry in column 2, substitut the following:“. Edappadi firka and such of the villages of Sankagiri firka of Tiruchengode taluk as are specified in item (18A) of the Appendix and the Mettur and Nangavalli firkas of Amalur taluk”.

PDF page 420 (printed page 403)

Open the original page

403PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES 11-00 A.M. Sir, I want to move all the amendments in List No. 10. They are only a corrigenda. * Shri A. Joseph: ……………In the interest of the organisation to which I belong and in the interest of the Government I appeal to the House to provide plural member constituencies with distributive voting without reservation. If the Law Ministr is not in a position to agree then I oppose his motion and I would ask you to record my disagreement with the proposal for single member constituencies without giving any facilities for th minorities. Dr. Ambedkar: I cannot accept the amendments. Mr. Deputy Speaker: Were similar plural member constituencies created in the U.P. ? Dr. Ambedkar: No, Sir. Nowhere has an exception been made. WEST B ENGAL O RDERS **Dr. Ambedkar: With regard to the West Bengal Order, I am prepared to accept the following amendments: Consolidated List No. 2—Parts 1 to 6 of Shri Samanta and Shri B. K. Das. Supplementary List No. 1: Amendment No. 1—Parts 1 and 2 and Amendment No. 2—Parts 1 to 8 of Shri Himatsingka and Mr. Haq, as modified by Supplementary List No. 5, Amendments 1 to 4 of Shri Jhunjhunwala and Shri Sinha.) I withdraw amendments Nos. 4 and 12 to 15 from the Supplementary List No. 3. The rest of them I move. Shri Chattopadhyay (West Bengal): I would like to move the amendment appearing in Supplementary List No. 2, It covers 108 items, of which I do not want to press item No. 30. *P. D., Vol. 13, Part II, 9th June 1951, p.10548. ** Ibid., p. 10554.