Vol. 15 · pages 416–420
As Free India's First Law Minister and Member of Opposition in Parliament, 1947–1956
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 416 (printed page 399)
399PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES
miss the whole thing. Is there any other member wishing to
move any other amendment ?
Shri Hiray (Bombay): Yes, Sir.
Mr. Speaker: In addition to what the Law Minister is
accepting ?
Shri Hiray: Yes.
Dr. Ambedkar: What has happened on account of the
decision relating to Dangs is that one more seat has been
added to Maharashtra and that seat belongs to the Tribal
people. Therefore a seat has to be provided in the constituencies
that have been delimited so far as Maharashtra is concerned.
This is the proposal which stands in the name of Mr. Hiray.
Either he may move it or I may move it.
Mr. Speaker: It is better if the Hon. Minister moves it.
Dr. Ambedkar: I beg to move:
In Table B, page 8, Nasik District, in column I, for the words
“Nasik urban” and “Nasik rural cum Igatpuri”, substitute the
words “Nashik Igatpuri “and against the same constituencies.—
(1) In column 2, omit all the words beginning with “Nasik
Municipal” and ending with “Iatpuri Municipal area” and
substitute “Nasik and Igatpuri Talukas including all Municipalities
therein”.
(2) In columns 3, 4, 5 omit the figurs given therein and
substitute 3, 1, 1 instead respectively.
Shri Kanhayala Desai (Bombay): There is a consequential
amendment relating to Pardi. One scheduled tribe seat which
is at present in Pardi Taluka should be removed and it should
become a general seat.
Dr. Ambedkar: That becomes consequential. That you
can do, Sir.
Mr. Speaker: Let it go on record that a specific point
was raised.
* Mr. Speaker : The amendment of Dr. Ambedkar about
Dangs. (as mentioned above).
The motion was adopted.
* P. D., Vol. 13, Part II, 9th June 1951, pp. 10534-35.
PDF page 417 (printed page 400)
400 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
Shri Hiray : There is my consequential amendment in List
No. 11.
Mr. Speaker: That is with reference to having one seat from
Maharashtra. That is purely consequential and we will accept it
as such.
The Hon. Law Minister wishes to have the leave of the House
to withdraw amendments Nos. 1, 2 and 4 in List No. 8 and all
the other hon. Members wish to have the leave of the House
to withdraw the various amendments and motions standing in
their names.
The amendments were by leave withdrawn.
[MR. DEPUTY SPEAKER IN THE CHAIR]
MADHYA PRADESH ORDER
Dr. Ambedkar: The amendments I am prepared to accept
are these:
List No. 1. —Amendments Nos. 6 and 8 in the name of Kishorimohan Tripathi
and others.
List No. 2. —Amendment No. 1, parts 1 to 5 of Dr. P. S. Deshmukh and others
together with two consequential amendments to be moved by Dr. Deshmukh.
List No. 3. —Amendment No. 2 in the name of Shri Kishormohan Tripathi and
others together with a consequential amendment to be moved by Shri Tripathi.
(Amendment No. 2 is to be slightly modified so as to read “Khamaria R.I.C. of
Khamaria Tehsil)” for “Khamaria Tehsil”.
List No. 6. —Amendment Nos. 1 to 5.
* Shri Jangde: Sir, I want to withdraw my amendments.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: I will later ask leave of the House for
the withdrawal. I will now put amendments No. 1 to 5 in list
No. 6. Have they any consequential amendments ?
Dr. Ambedkar: There, are no amendments to these
amendments Nos. 1 to 5.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: The question is:
[For text of the motions see Dr. Ambedkars amendments Nos. 1 to 5 in List
No. 6 printed in Appendix XXXIII, annexure No. 3.]
The motion was adopted.
* P. D. Vol. 13, Part II, 9th June 1950, p. 10541.
PDF page 418 (printed page 401)
401PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES
*Dr. Deshmukh: I have to move my amendments.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: Yes, That is with reference to
amendment No. 1 in List No. 2.
Dr. Ambedkar: There are amendments to his amendments
Nos. 1 to 5 of List 2.
**Mr. Deputy Speaker: To this extent the President’s
Order stands modified. Leave may be granted to all the
Members to withdraw their amendments. All the other
amendments moved by other hon. Members were, by leave
withdrawn.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: The Madhya Pradesh Order is over.
Dr. Ambedkar: There are other friends who are pressing
me that their matter may be taken up first, that is West
Bengal and Hyderabad.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: I am taking up Madras.
MADRAS ORDER
Dr. Ambedkar: With regard to the Madras Order, I am
prepared to accept the following amendments:—
List No. 4. — Amendmnt No. 1, part 3, second alternative, and part 4, of
Shri Kala Venkatarao.
Amendment No. 2, parts 1 and 2, of Shri Keshava Rao.
List No. 6.— Amendment No. 1, Parts 1 and 2, of Shri Sanjivaya, subject
to the recast of part 2 as follows :
“That for all the entries against “Erode” in columns 2, 3, 4
and 5 the following be substituted :
1 2 345
Erode … Erode taluk, Bhavani taluk, Dhara-puram taluk
[excluding such of the villages of Kundadam
Firka as are specified in item No. (19) of
the Appendix] and Kugalur Firka and such
of the villages of Gobichetti-palayam Firka
of Gobichettipala-yam taluk of Coimbatore
district as are specifed in item No. (18) of
the Appendix ; and Karur taluk Kattalai,
Kulithalai and Panjarpatti Firkas of Kulithalai
taluk of Tiruchirapalli district.
2 1…
* P. D. Vol. 13, Part II, 9th June 1950, p. 10543.
** Ibid., pp. 10545-47.
PDF page 419 (printed page 402)
402 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
List No. 11.— Amendment No. 2, parts 1 to 3, by Shri Kodandarama
Reddy and others.
List No. 12. —Amendments Nos. 1 to 13, subject to amendment No. 6
being modified by Hon. Minister of Law as follows;—
That for all the entries against “Tiruppur” in volumns 2, 3, 4 and 5the
follwoing be substituted : —
1 2 345
Tiruppur The Kollegal, Gobichettipalayam and Tiruppur
taluks and Savur and Avanashi firkas of Avanashi
taluk (excluding the Kugalur firka and such of
the villages of Gobichettipalayam firka of the
Gopichetti-palayam taluk as are specified in item
No. (18) of the Appendix and the the Varapatti
firka of Tiruppur taluk) of the Coimbatore District.
1 ……
I beg to move:
(i) At page 4 in Table A.—Parliamentary Constituencies, against
the entry ‘Dharmapuri “for the words “and Edappadi firka of
Tiruchengoda taluka of Salem District” substitute the words
“and Edappadi firka and such of the villages of Sankagiri firka
of Tiruchengode taluk of Salem District as are specified in item
18A of the Appendix”.
(ii) At page 4, in Table A.—Parliamentary Constituencies, against
the entry “Tiruchengoda” for the words “(excluding Edappadi
firka of Tiruchengoda taluk)” substitute the words “(excluding
Edappadi firka and such of the villages of Sankagiri firka
of Tiruchengode taluk as are specified in item 18A of the
Appendix)”.
(iii) At page 11 in Table B.—Assembly Constituencies, against the
entry “Tiruchengode”, for the entry in column 2, substitute the
following:
“Tiruchengode taluk (excluding Edappadi firka and such of the
villages of Sankagiri firka and of the Tiruchengode firka as are
specified in items (18A) and (16) respectively of the Appendix)”.
(iv) At page 11 in Table B.—Assembly Constituencis, against the
entry “Edappadi”, for the entry in column 2, substitut the
following:“.
Edappadi firka and such of the villages of Sankagiri firka
of Tiruchengode taluk as are specified in item (18A) of the
Appendix and the Mettur and Nangavalli firkas of Amalur
taluk”.
PDF page 420 (printed page 403)
403PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES
11-00 A.M.
Sir, I want to move all the amendments in List No. 10.
They are only a corrigenda.
* Shri A. Joseph: ……………In the interest of the
organisation to which I belong and in the interest of
the Government I appeal to the House to provide plural
member constituencies with distributive voting without
reservation. If the Law Ministr is not in a position to
agree then I oppose his motion and I would ask you
to record my disagreement with the proposal for single
member constituencies without giving any facilities for
th minorities.
Dr. Ambedkar: I cannot accept the amendments.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: Were similar plural member
constituencies created in the U.P. ?
Dr. Ambedkar: No, Sir. Nowhere has an exception
been made.
WEST B ENGAL O RDERS
**Dr. Ambedkar: With regard to the West Bengal
Order, I am prepared to accept the following amendments:
Consolidated List No. 2—Parts 1 to 6 of Shri Samanta and Shri B.
K. Das.
Supplementary List No. 1: Amendment No. 1—Parts 1 and 2 and
Amendment No. 2—Parts 1 to 8 of Shri Himatsingka and Mr. Haq,
as modified by Supplementary List No. 5, Amendments 1 to 4 of Shri
Jhunjhunwala and Shri Sinha.)
I withdraw amendments Nos. 4 and 12 to 15 from the Supplementary
List No. 3. The rest of them I move.
Shri Chattopadhyay (West Bengal): I would like to
move the amendment appearing in Supplementary List
No. 2, It covers 108 items, of which I do not want to
press item No. 30.
*P. D., Vol. 13, Part II, 9th June 1951, p.10548.
** Ibid., p. 10554.