Vol. 8 · pages 106–110
Pakistan or the Partition of India
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 106
81
PAKISTAN : WEAKENING OF THE DEFENCES
This table brings out in an unmistakable manner the profound
changes which have been going on in the communal composition of
the Indian Army particularly after 1919. They are (1) a phenomenal
rise in the strength of the Punjabi Musalman and the Pathan, (2)
a substantial reduction in the position of Sikhs from first to third,
(3) the degradation of the Rajputs to the fourth place, and (4)
the shutting out of the U. P. Brahmins, the Madrasi Musalmans,
and the Tamilians, both Brahmins and Non-Brahmins.
A further analysis of the figures for 1930, which discloses the
communal composition of the Indian Infantry and Indian Cavalry,
has been made by Mr. Chaudhari in the following table.*
Communal Composition of the Indian Army in 1930
Class Areas
Percentage in
Infantry
Perce-
ntage
in
Cavalry
Excluding
Gurkhas
Including
Gurkhas
1. Punjabi Musalman Punjab 27 22.6 14.28
2. Gurkhas Nepal ... 16.4 ...
3. Sikhs Punjab 16.24 13.58 23.81
4. Dogras North Punjab and
Kashmir
11.4 9.54 9.53
5. Jats Rajputana, U. P.,
Punjab
9.5 7.94 19.06
6. Pathans N.-W. F. Province 7.57 6.35 4.76
7. Mahrattas Konkan 6.34 5.33 ...
8. Garhwalis Garhwal 4.53 3.63 ...
9. U. P. Rajputs U. P. 3.04 2.54 ...
10. Rajputana Rajputs Rajputana 2.8 2.35 ...
11. Kumaonis Kumaon 2.44 2.05 ...
12. Gujars N. E. Rajputana 1.52 1.28 ...
13. Punjabi Hindus Punjab 1.52 1.28 ...
14. Ahirs Do. 1.22 1.024 ...
15. Musalmans, Rajputs,
Ranghars.
Neighbourhood of
Delhi
1.22 1.024 7.14
16. Kaimkhanis Rajputana ... ... 4.76
17. Kachins Burma 1.22 1.024 ...
18. Chins Do. 1.22 1.024 ...
19. Karens Do. 1.22 1.024 ...
20. Dekhani Musalmans Deccan ... ... 4.76
21. Hindustani Musalmans U. P. ... ... 2.38
*This table shows the percentage of men of each eligible class in the Indian
Infantry (82 active and 18 training battalions), the Indian Cavalry (21 regiments),
and the 20 battalions of the Gurkha Infantry. This table does not include the
Indian personnel of (a) the 19 batteries of Indian Mountain Artillery, and (b) 3
regiments of Sappers and Miners, (c) the Indian Signal Corps, and (d) the Corps of
Indian Pioneers, all of which are composed of different proportions of the Punjabi
Musalmans, Sikhs, Pathans, Hindustani Hindus and Musalmans, Madrasis of
all classes and Hazra Afghans, either in class units or class companies. Except
that some units in these arms of the service are composed of the Madrasis and
Hazras, now enrolled in other units of the Indian Army, the class composition
of these units does not materially alter the proportion of the classes as given in
the table. This table does not also include the Indian personnel attached to the
British Infantry and Artillery units.
PDF page 107 (printed page 82)
82 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
Reducing these figures in terms of communities, we get
the following percentage as it stood in 1930 :—
Communities
Percentage in Infantry
Percentage in
CavalryIncluding
Gurkhas
Excluding
Gurkhas
1. Hindus and Sikhs .. 60.55 50.554 61.92
2. Gurkhas .. .. … 16.4 …
3. Muhammadans .. 35.79 29.974 30.08
4. Burmans .. .. 3.66 3.072 …
These figures show the communal composition of the Indian
Army. The Musalmans according to Mr. Chaudhari formed
36% of the Indian Infantry and 30% of the Indian Cavalry.
These figures relate to the year 1930. We must now find out
what changes have taken place since then in this proportion.
It is one of the most intriguing things in the Military
history of India that no information is available on this point
after 1930. It is impossible to know what the proportion of
the Muslims in the Indian Army at present is. There is no
Government publication from which such information can be
gathered. In the past, there was no dearth of publications
giving this information. It is very suprising that they should
have now disappeared, or if they do appear, that they should
cease to contain this information. Not only is there no
Government publication containing information on this point,
but Government has refused to give any information on the
point when asked by members of the Central Legislative
Assembly. The following questions and answers taken from
the proceedings of the Central Legislative Assembly show how
Government has been strenuously combating every attempt to
obtain information on the point :
There was an interpellation on 15th September 1938, when
the following questions were asked and replies as stated below
were given :—
Arrangements for the Defence of India*
* Legislative Assembly Debates, 1938 Vol. VI, page 2462.
PDF page 108
83
PAKISTAN : WEAKENING OF THE DEFENCES
Q. 1360: Mr.Badri Dutt Pande (on behalf of Mr. Amarendra
Nath Chattopadhya).
(a) x x x x
(b) x x x x
(c) x x x x
(d) How many Indians have been recruited during 1937
and 1938 as soldiers and officers during 1937-38 for the
Infantry and Cavalry respectively? Amongst the soldiers
and officers recruited, how many are Punjabi Sikhs,
Pathans, Garhwalis, Mahrattas, Madrasis, Biharis,
Bengalis and Hindustanis of the United Provinces and
Gurkhas ?
(e) If none but the Punjabi Sikhs, Pathans and Garhwalis
have been recruited, is it in contemplation of the
Honourable Member to recruit from all the Provinces
for the defence of India and give them proper military
training ?
(f) Will the Defence Secretary be pleased to state if
Provincial Governments will be asked to raise Provincial
Regiments, trained and fully mechanised, for the defence
of India? If not, what is his plan of raising an efficient
army for the defence of India ?
Mr. C.M.G. Ogilvie :
(a) The Honourable Member will appreciate that it is not
in the public interest to disclose the details of such
arrangements.
(b) 5 cadets and 33 Indian apprentices were recruited for
the Indian Air Force during 1937-38.
(c) During 1937-38, 5 Indians have already been recruited
to commissioned ranks in the Royal Indian Navy, 4
will be taken by competitive examination in October
1938, and 3 more by special examination of “Dufferin”
cadets only. During the same period, 314 Indians were
recruited to different non-commissioned categories in
the Royal Indian Navy.
PDF page 109 (printed page 84)
84 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
(d) During the year ending the 31st March 1938, 54 Indians
were commissioned as Indian Commissioned Officers.
They are now attached to British units for training,
and it is not yet possible to say what proportion will
be posted to infantry and cavalry, respectively. During
the same period, 961 Indian soldiers were recruited for
cavalry, and 7,970 for infantry. Their details by classes
are not available at Army Headquarters and to call for
them from the recruiting officers all over India would
not justify the expenditure of time and labour involved.
(e) No.
(f) The reply to the first portion is in the negative. The reply
to the second portion is that India already possesses
an efficient army and so far as finances permit, every
effort is made to keep it up-to-date in all respects.
Mr. S. Satyamurti : With reference to the answers to clauses
(d) and (e) of the question taken together, may I know whether
the attention of Government has been drawn to statements
made by many public men that the bulk of the army is from
the Punjab and from one community ? Have Government
considered those facts and will Government also consider the
desirability of making the army truly national by extending
recruitment to all provinces and communities, so as to avoid
the danger present in all countries of a military dictatorship
seizing political power ?
Mr. C. M. G. Ogilvie : I am not sure how that arises from this
question, but I am prepared to say that provincial boundaries
do not enter into Government’s calculations at all. The best
soldiers are chosen to provide the best army for India and not
for any province, and in this matter national considerations
must come above provincial considerations. Where the bulk
of best military material is found, there we will go to get it,
and not elsewhere.
Mr. S. Satyamurti: May I know whether the bulk of the
army is from the Punjab and whether the Government have
forgotten the experience of the brave exploits of men from
my province not very long ago in the Indian Army, and may
I know if Madrasis are practically kept out and many other
provinces are kept out of the army altogether ?
PDF page 110
85
PAKISTAN : WEAKENING OF THE DEFENCES
Mr. C. M. G. Ogilvie : Madras is not practically kept out of
the army. Government gladly acknowledge the gallant services
of the Madrasis in the army and they are now recruited to
those Units where experience has proved them to be best.
There are some 4,500 serving chiefly in the Sappers and
Miners and Artillery.
Mr. S. Satyamurti: Out of a total of 120,000 ?
Mr. C. M. G. Ogilvie : About that.
Mr. S. Satyamurti: May I take it, that, that is a proper
proportion, considering the population of Madras, the revenue
that Madras pays to the Central exchequer, and the necessity
of having a national army recruited from all the provinces ?
Mr. C. M. G. Ogilvie: The only necessity we recognise is
to obtain the best possible army.
Mr. S. Satyamurti: May I know by what tests Government
have come to the conclusion that provinces other than the
Punjab cannot supply the best elements in the Indian Army ?
Mr. Ogilvie : By experience.
Dr. Sir Ziauddin Ahmed: May I ask if it is not a fact that
all branches of Accounts Department are monopolised by the
Madrasis and will Government immediately reduce the number
in proportion to their numerical strength in India ?
Mr. Ogilvie: I do not see how that arises from this question
either, but the Government are again not prepared to sacrifice
efficiency for any provincial cause.
Indian Regiment consisting of Indians belonging to Different
Castes*
Q. 1078 : Mr. M. Anantasayanam Ayyangar (on behalf of
Mr. Manu Subedar):
(a) Will the Defence Secretary state whether any experiment
has ever been made under British rule of having an
Indian regiment consisting of Indians recruited from
different provinces and belonging to the different
castes and sections, such as Sikhs, Mahrattas, Rajputs,
Brahmins and Muslims ?
*Legislative Assembly Debates, 1938, Vol. VI, page 2478.